EXTREMISTS

EXTREMISTS Hey Mumbai University FYBA IDOL students! Today, let’s delve into the world of History Of Modern India , focusing on “EXTREMISTS.” Get ready to uncover the factors, ideologies, and contributions that characterized this transformative period in Indian history. First up, we’ll explore the causes behind the rise of Extremism within the Congress. From disillusionment with British policies to the desire for more assertive methods of protest, we’ll unravel the forces that propelled this radical shift within the nationalist movement. Next, let’s delve into the ideology of Extremism. We’ll examine how Extremists advocated for more aggressive tactics, including boycotts, strikes, and civil disobedience, in contrast to the moderate approach of negotiations and petitions. But what about the four-fold programme of the Extremists? Brace yourselves as we uncover their demands for Swaraj (self-rule), Swadeshi (boycott of foreign goods), Boycotts, and National Education. These pillars formed the backbone of their agenda for Indian independence. As we journey through the Extremist phase of the Indian National Congress, we’ll shine a spotlight on the Home Rule movement. We’ll explore how leaders like Bal Gangadhar Tilak mobilized the masses and ignited a fervent desire for self-governance across the country. But that’s not all! We’ll also evaluate the roles of key Extremist leaders such as Lokmanya Tilak, Lala Lajpat Rai, and Bipin Chandra Pal. From their fiery speeches to their unwavering commitment to the cause, we’ll uncover the indelible mark they left on India’s struggle for freedom. And lastly, get ready to immerse yourselves in the fascinating story of the Home Rule Movement. From its origins to its impact on India’s quest for independence, we’ll unravel the legacy of this pivotal chapter in our nation’s history. So, FYBA IDOL Mumbai University students, get ready to learn about –”EXTREMISTS” with customized idol notes just for you. Let’s jump into this exploration together Follow Us For More Updates Instagram Telegram Whatsapp QUESTION 1:- Explain in short the causes of rise of Extremism   Introduction:         The rise of Extremism in India during the early 20th century was influenced by several important factors that shaped the course of the Indian National Congress. This phase marked a shift from the earlier moderate approach, with leaders like Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Bipin Chandra Pal, and Lala Lajpat Rai leading the charge. Let’s explore the reasons behind this shift, keeping it simple and straightforward. Dissatisfaction with Moderate Leaders: Young leaders felt that moderate approaches like petitions and letters were ineffective in influencing British authorities. Believed moderates were too passive and neglected the urgent demands of the people. Perception that moderates lacked confidence in fair play by the British added to the discontent. Economic Exploitation: British economic policies, including the Tariff and Cotton Duties Act of 1894 and 1896, favored British manufacturers. These policies led to the deterioration of the Indian economy, causing frustration and discontent. The impact of famines and diseases during this period intensified resentment against British rule. Specific Grievances Leading to Extremism: Dissatisfaction prompted a shift towards more assertive actions. Leaders like Tilak, Pal, and Rai advocated for radical strategies to address specific issues. Boycott and Swadeshi: Extremists endorsed boycotts as a powerful tool for protest, refusing to buy British goods. The Swadeshi movement encouraged the use of locally-made products, promoting self-reliance and challenging British economic dominance. These strategies aimed at hitting the British economically while fostering a sense of national pride. Leaders’ Advocacy: Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Bipin Chandra Pal, and Lala Lajpat Rai played pivotal roles in advocating Extremist ideals. Their emphasis on direct action and mass involvement became the hallmark of this phase. Contribution of Specific Leaders: Bal Gangadhar Tilak’s call for “Swaraj is my birthright” became a rallying cry for Extremists. Bipin Chandra Pal’s passionate speeches inspired many to join the cause. Lala Lajpat Rai’s unwavering commitment to Indian nationalism left a lasting impact. Assertive Stance Against British Rule: Extremists’ actions represented a collective desire for a more forceful response to British rule. Their agenda set the stage for a more confrontational approach in the Indian National Congress.   CONCLUSION:-        The rise of Extremism in India was driven by a combination of dissatisfaction with moderate methods, economic exploitation, and specific grievances that prompted leaders to adopt radical strategies. The actions of prominent leaders and the shift towards assertive stances laid the groundwork for a transformative phase in the Indian National Congress and the broader struggle for independence. QUESTION 2 :- Explain in short the ideology of Extremism.  Introduction:     Understanding the differences between the ideologies of Extremists and Modertes is like peeking into two different mindsets within the Indian National Congress during a crucial period. Let’s break down these differences in a simple way to grasp how leaders like Bal Gangadhar Tilak brought a new flavor to the fight for India’s independence. Approach to Independence: Extremists, led by Tilak, thought the old ways of asking nicely (like writing letters and petitions) were not working. They believed in a more intense, militant approach to shake things up and make the British pay attention. Moderates, on the other hand, believed in a slow and steady path, working within the existing system to bring about change. Connection with India’s History: Extremists were like history buffs. They looked at India’s past and thought, “Hey, we were pretty awesome back then!” They wanted to bring back the glory of ancient India and not just copy the West. Moderates were more into Western ideas, thinking that India should change by adopting Western ways of doing things. Nationalism with a Punch: Extremists were all about strong, non-violent nationalism. They wanted the Indian National Congress to shout out loud that self-government was the goal. Moderates were more chill about it, focusing on reforms rather than making big demands for self-government. Organizing the Masses: Extremists were like cheerleaders for the masses. They wanted regular people to join the fight and put pressure on the British Government by uniting in a big, powerful way. Moderates were more into polite discussions and working through official channels, not so much about getting